AdaRPT: An Adaptive Rule Pattern Transfer Model for Fully Inductive Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge graph reasoning (KGR) is a key technology that infers missing facts in knowledge graphs (KGs). Given that real-world scenarios typically encounter unseen KGs with new entities and new relations, researchers have begun to explore fully inductive KGR methods. This setting presents greater challenges and has not been fully explored. Current methods primarily construct relation graphs based on the original KG to facilitate message passing between relations. These models have made significant progress in achieving fully inductive reasoning. However, as relation graphs focus solely on the co-occurrence patterns between relations, they often fail to capture reasoning patterns in KGs, which causes the model to struggle in effectively distinguishing between different relations and entities. This limitation severely restrict the reasoning capabilities of existing methods. In light of this, we propose the Adaptive Rule Pattern Transfer model (AdaRPT) for KGR. It aims to leverage logical rules for each relation in the KG to learn more comprehensive and transferable knowledge representations for entities and relations. For entities, we design a non-parameter message passing model that aggregates path information from the query entity to other entities. The path information for each entity is then matched with rules to obtain the transferable feature of each entity. And for relations, we extract both reasoning and co-occurrence patterns from KGs as transferable relation features. Finally, a path-based graph neural network (GNN) is employed on the transferable features of entities and relations to perform reasoning on KGs. Extensive experimental evaluations on 43 datasets for both inductive and transductive reasoning demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization capability of AdaRPT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".