MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412409721 · doi:10.26493/1855-3974.3365.d2c

Centrality in connected graphs via convexity or concavity

2025· article· en· W4412409721 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Mathematica Contemporanea · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConvexityCentralityCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In graph theory, several central parts of graphs have been defined. The center, median and the security center are three such concepts defined for any connected graph, while others are specific to trees. These definitions typically involve a function defined on the vertex set of the graph. This paper generalizes the concepts of convex and concave functions, originally defined for trees, to connected graphs. Using this, we provide a unified approach to prove the known results that each of the center, median, and security center of a connected graph is either a cut vertex or lies within a block. Additionally, we introduce three new central parts of a connected graph as generalizations of the subtree core, core vertices, and characteristic set of a tree, and examine their properties in relation to the center, median, and security center. We also show that for any graph G, there exists a supergraph G' such that the subgraph induced by the characteristic center of G' is isomorphic to G. Finally, we propose several open problems related to subgraph core and core center.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it