MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412467167 · doi:10.4236/jmf.2025.153020

Mean Reversion and Self-Valuation of European Common Stocks

2025· article· en· W4412467167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean reversionEconomicsReversionValuation (finance)Financial economicsEconometricsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents empirical evidence that European stock markets independently determine the values of their listed common stocks. It shows that European common stocks establish their own discount rates, which in turn determine their equity values. The study models mean reversion in continuous time and demonstrates its minimal impact on prediction accuracy, indicating the efficiency of self-valuation. Mean reversion of current stock prices is an activity where investors assess the values of common stocks listed on an exchange. The speed of mean reversion of a current stock price determines the discount rate. The continuous-time first-order autoregressive model captures both the mean reversion of a current stock price and the volatility due to mean reversion, describing the dynamics of mean reversion in pricing. The closing prices of European common stocks are shown to be volatile, indicating the inherent risks of investing in common stocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it