MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412538691 · doi:10.1016/j.csite.2025.106674

An analytical prediction for charging–discharging cycles of metal foam composite phase change materials thermal energy storage

2025· article· en· W4412538691 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Studies in Thermal Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversitas Sebelas Maret
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermal energy storageComposite numberPhase changeEnergy storageMetal foamPhase-change materialThermalComposite materialPhase (matter)MetalThermal energyThermodynamicsMetallurgyChemistryAluminiumPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main drawback of phase change materials is their low thermal conductivity, resulting in poor thermal performance. Recent research has attempted to enhance heat transfer and increase the thermal conductivity of phase change materials, including the addition of metal foams. However, modeling metal foam composite phase change materials using conventional methods, such as numerical simulations, can be computationally expensive due to their complex structure and non-linear phase transition. This paper proposes a unified mathematical framework based on a two-phase Stefan problem subject to a time-dependent convective boundary in an annulus, capable of predicting both solidification and melting processes for charging and discharging metal foam composite phase change materials. Three physical stages, along with four temporal regimes and five spatial layers, are considered to forge asymptotic solutions around a small Stefan number. The effective thermal conductivity is calculated by a three-dimensional structured tetrakaidecahedron model, while other thermophysical properties are obtained through the method of volume averaging. The analytical results are compared with numerical solutions and validated against experimental data in the literature. The computational time is found to be up to 2 orders of magnitude faster than the enthalpy method for each cycle. Effects of porosity and Biot number on the solution are investigated, utilizing dimensionless temperature, interface motion, and solid fraction. Reducing porosity by 2% alone could decrease cycling times by over 25%. The novel analytical model provides an accurate yet computationally efficient prediction of the charging–discharging cycles of metal foam composite phase change materials through a unified mathematical framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it