Characterization of Brown Seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) and Sugar Kelp (Saccharina latissima) Extracts Using Temporal Check-All-That-Apply
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seaweed is a sustainable ingredient that has been suggested to improve the nutritional aspects as well as the sensory properties of different food products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the flavor properties of extracts from brown seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) and sugar kelp (Saccharina latissimi) obtained at different temperatures. These varieties commonly grow in the Atlantic Ocean. The seaweed samples were extracted using water at three different temperatures (50 °C, 70 °C, and 90 °C). The volatile fraction of the extracts was extracted with headspace solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The headspace chemical composition varies significantly among seaweed extracts and at different extraction temperatures. Major classes of identified compounds were aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, hydrocarbons, and halogenated compounds. Extracts were also evaluated using temporal check-all-that-apply (with 84 untrained participants). The different temperatures had minimal impact on the flavour properties of the brown seaweed samples, but the extraction temperature did influence the properties of the sugar kelp samples. Increasing the extraction temperature seemed to lead to an increase in bitterness, savouriness, and earthy flavor, but future studies are needed to confirm this finding. This study continues the exploration of the flavor properties of seaweeds and identifies the dynamic flavor profile of brown seaweed and sugar kelp under different extraction conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it