MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412590542 · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1419217

Post-truth politics vs. newspaper coverage: the COVID-19 pandemic and transnational human migration in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom

2025· article· en· W4412590542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Political Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Security and Public Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicPolitics2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceGeographyMedia studiesVirologySociologyLawMedicineOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction In the context of a presumed post-truth world where emotion and ideology increasingly shape public discourse, this study explores the media’s role in constructing and disseminating narratives about transnational human migration. The COVID-19 pandemic added a new layer of complexity, biologically securitizing mobility at a time when migration was already framed by xenophobia and securitization in the Western world. This study investigates how major newspapers in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom covered migration during the first year of the pandemic, revealing how media constructions reflected and reinforced national attitudes. Methods A mixed-method discursive analysis was conducted on 225 articles (25 from each of nine major newspapers) from January 1 to December 31, 2020, selected for their topical relevance through the Factiva database. Articles were categorized quantitatively by topic and sentiment and qualitatively analyzed using constant comparison methods. The study focused on recurring topics, dominant narratives, and sentiment orientations (positive, neutral, neutral-negative, or negative) to identify country-specific media ‘truths’ about migration during the pandemic. Results Distinct national patterns emerged. Canadian newspapers exhibited largely positive or neutral portrayals of migrants, highlighting their economic and social contributions. U.S. coverage was polarized, reflecting both supportive and hostile attitudes, especially regarding Latin American migration and the Title 42 policy. U.K. articles were more frequently negative or securitized, especially concerning Channel crossings. Across all countries, themes of migrant precarity, humanitarian solidarity, and essential labor during COVID-19 were common, yet framed differently depending on national context and media sentiment. Discussion The findings illustrate how media in post-truth societies selectively constructed ‘truths’ about migration during a global crisis. While Canadian media maintained a largely humanitarian and pragmatic framing, U.S. and U.K. media leaned toward narratives of threat and economic burden. These constructions reflect deeper societal and political cleavages, where media act as both agents and arenas of discursive influence. The research underscores the importance of media literacy and critical discourse analysis in unpacking the role of journalism in shaping migration politics during times of uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it