MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exponential control barrier function and model predictive control for jerk-level reactive motion planning of quadrotors

2025· article· en· W4412603953 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueControl Engineering Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJerkModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Exponential functionControl (management)Motion planningFunction (biology)Motion (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringPhysicsMathematicsRobotAccelerationArtificial intelligenceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quadrotors require efficient reactive motion planning algorithms to ensure safe autonomous operations in dynamic environments. One common strategy for reactive motion planning is model predictive control (MPC); however, conventional MPC-based methods often fall short of guaranteeing collision avoidance when encountering dynamic obstacles. To address this limitation, we develop an enhanced framework that combines MPC with control barrier functions (CBFs) for improved safety and a Kalman Filter (KF) for predicting obstacle behavior, increasing responsiveness to dynamic obstacles. We utilize a high-order closed-loop model of the quadrotor along with exponential CBFs, enabling trajectory control at the jerk level, unlike existing MPC-CBF methods that rely on acceleration-level planning. Extensive hardware experiments across multiple scenarios demonstrate that this approach significantly enhances safety by increasing the minimum vehicle-obstacle distance and enabling successful navigation through complex situations, such as avoiding fast-swinging obstacles, where traditional MPC-only methods fail. Hardware-based sensitivity analysis further reveals the algorithm’s overall robustness to variations in parameter values, provides insight into parameter tuning, and highlights the critical role of accurate obstacle predictions in dynamic environments. Our findings indicate that the MPC-CBF-KF framework is a promising, robust, and computationally feasible solution for quadrotor motion planning in both dynamic and static environments. • Development of MPC-CBF-KF reactive motion planner for quadrotor navigation in dynamic environments, validated experimentally. • Integrating exponential CBF with a high-order quadrotor model to control the jerk of the trajectory rather than acceleration. • Hardware-based sensitivity analysis of key tuning parameters on the motion planner’s performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it