MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412647553 · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2025.106321

Urban mobility and carbon emissions: Decoding the influence of sociodemographic factors, trip-level built environment, and travel behaviour of workers in three UK cities

2025· article· en· W4412647553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCities · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBusinessTravel behaviorBuilt environmentEnvironmental healthDemographic economicsTransport engineeringGeographyEconomicsEngineeringMedicineCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantifying how individual-level travel patterns intersect with built environment features and sociodemographic characteristics is essential for addressing transportation-related CO₂ emissions. Existing evidence is predominantly based on aggregated individual and/or area-based data, neglecting important drivers of emissions at the trip level and variations by individual characteristics, including employment types. GPS-tracked mobility patterns from a random sample of 587 workers in three UK cities (Brighton and Hove, Leeds, and Birmingham) are analysed to estimate CO 2 emissions at the trip-level and person-level, accounting for multi-modal travel. Walkability and public transport availability at trip origins is associated with reduced emissions at the trip level but not overall individual emissions. Employing latent class analysis, participants were grouped based on multiple sociodemographic characteristics. Women with no access to a car were identified as low emitters, while individuals with access to a car as high emitters, regardless of gender and education level. These findings reinforce the need for policy frameworks that extend beyond traditional single-location strategies. Enhancing walkability and public transit connectivity in key activity hubs such as commercial, leisure, and other high-traffic areas, alongside incentives for behaviour change, offers significant potential to reduce transportation CO₂ emissions. Moreover, as dynamic population shifts and evolving travel patterns weaken the effectiveness of monocentric urban structures, our findings suggest that transitioning toward a polycentric model can be a more effective strategy for lowering transport-related CO₂ emissions. By emphasizing this broader spatial reach, urban planners and policymakers can better tailor interventions to distinct population segments, effectively supporting low-carbon travel and advancing sustainable urban mobility goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it