MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412661687 · doi:10.37491/unz.105.4

Experience Of Foreign Countries In Implementing Digital Technologies In Waste Management

2025· article· en· W4412661687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Scientific Notes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEconomic and Technological Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessProcess management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The foreign experience of implementing digital technologies in waste management has been analyzed, and the potential for their adaptation in Ukraine has been identified. The study covers countries with varying levels of economic development and diverse technological solutions, providing a broad range of approaches to waste management. The analysis of selected countries is based on reports such as the Global Waste Management Outlook 2024, What a Waste 2.0 Update, and the European Environment Agency 2024. Primary focus is given to Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, big data, and mobile applications, their key applications in waste management, quantitative outcomes, and institutional and financial mechanisms for implementation. IoT is applied for monitoring container fill levels, waste sorting, logistics optimization, and environmental monitoring. For instance, in Barcelona (Spain), IoT-enabled containers reduced waste collection frequency by 20–50 %, lowering CO2 emissions, while in Singapore, IoT systems with GPS trackers cut transport costs by 15 %, saving $2 million annually. AI is utilized for automated sorting (Tokyo, Japan: 95 % accuracy, 30 % increase in plastic recycling) and logistics and recycling optimization (Munich, Germany: 65 % waste recycling, €5 million annual savings). Blockchain ensures transparency in the recycling chain, as in China, where the AntChain platform tracks 1.2 million tons of plastic, reducing illegal dumping by 12 %. Big data facilitates waste volume forecasting and process optimization, as seen in the USA (Rubicon Global), while mobile apps like Recycle Coach (Canada/USA) and TrashOut (Slovakia/Czechia) enhance citizen engagement in sorting and environmental initiatives. In Ukraine, where waste management is hindered by war and limited resources, adapting these technologies holds significant potential. Pilot implementation of IoT sensors in cities, expansion of the Sortuy app’s functionality by integrating a map of construction waste disposal sites, IoT monitoring, and blockchain for transparency are proposed. Implementation requires international funding, grants, infrastructure modernization, and legislative support. Adopting digital technologies could lead to savings (up to 30 % of disposal costs), reduced environmental impact, and the development of a circular economy in Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it