MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412701082 · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2025.101230

Techno-economic analysis of laccase production, immobilization and use of the immobilized biocatalyst in hospital wastewater bioremediation

2025· article· en· W4412701082 on OpenAlexafffund
Komla Alokpa, Hubert Cabana

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Challenges · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEnzyme-mediated dye degradation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsBioremediationLaccaseWastewaterBiocatalysisImmobilized enzymeProduction (economics)ChemistrySewage treatmentPulp and paper industryWaste managementEnvironmental scienceBiochemical engineeringCatalysisEnvironmental engineeringEnzymeBiochemistryContaminationBiologyEngineeringEconomicsEcologyReaction mechanism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Copper sulfate showed a dual effect of inducing and repressing laccase activity. • Cost analyses show that laccase-based bioprocess is promising. • Cost of wastewater treatment by laccase is competitive and can be further reduced. • Reduction of labor and raw material cost can promote laccase-based bioprocess. In this study, cost analyses were performed to assess the economic feasibility and the competitiveness of a combined bioprocess for the production of a T. hirsuta laccase under submerged fermentation, immobilization of the crude enzyme and use of the formulated biocatalyst for hospital wastewater treatment. The laccase was immobilized on an amino-functionalized silica microsphere attached to a polyethylene scaffolding. Capital (CapEx) and operational (OpEx) expenses were calculated for each step of the process, considering the cost of equipment, raw materials, workload and utilities. For laccase production, labor cost represented the highest contributor to the total cost (51.6 %), followed by the equipment cost (42.2 %), while the costs of raw materials and energy were significantly low at 5.0 % and 1.1 %, respectively. The cost of the crude laccase was estimated to be 3.90 CAD (2024) kU −1 . In the immobilization step, the cost of raw materials represents the major cost contributor with 89.9 % due to the important cost of the immobilization support, while labor accounted for 6.4 %, equipment 3.6 % and energy 0.1 %. Sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the cost dynamics with respect to the number of laccase production batches, the cost of raw materials, electricity, and labor. The cost of pilot-scale wastewater treatment using the formulated biocatalyst, taking into account a less expensive but similar immobilisation support, was estimated to be 0.87 CAD (2024) m −3 , which is a reasonable cost but can be further reduced after the process optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ChallengesSame topicEnzyme-mediated dye degradationFrench-language works237,207