Development of an Integrated Learning Experience Management Model through Storytelling to Promote Executive Functions for Early Childhood
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aimed to develop an integrated learning experience model through storytelling to promote executive functions in early childhood and investigate children’s executive tasks. Using purposive sampling, the target group consisted of 40 kindergarten children in their third year at Khon Kaen Kindergarten School, during the first semester of the 2024 academic year. The experiment lasted eight weeks, two days per week, and 60 minutes per day. The research tools used included an integrated learning experience model through storytelling to promote executive functions and the MU.EF-101 form. A single-group study was conducted, with measurements taken only after the experiment. Data were analyzed using percentages. The research findings revealed: 1) The integrated learning experience model through storytelling to promote executive functions for early childhood comprises five components: (1) Background, theories, principles, objectives, and content; (2) A four-step experiential process including create curiosity interest, analytical thinking and experiential connection; brainstorm to create a model symbol; and action and Reflection; (3) Evaluation; (4) Application of the model; and (5) Supporting factors. Expert evaluation indicated that the model was highly appropriate. 2) Early childhood children who experienced the model demonstrated improved executive functions at a good level or higher (T-Score 56–60), accounting for 85 percent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it