Minimizing Age of Semantic Information for Analytics-Oriented Video Streaming Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Video streaming systems are critical for intelligent applications to transmit video data from end devices to servers for real-time analysis. In contrast to traditional human-centric streaming systems, which prioritize user-perceived metrics, machine-centric streaming systems are designed to continuously provide fresh and accurate information for analytics purposes. Although numerous studies have investigated policies to optimize streaming performance, most of them employ the segment-by-segment streaming framework from human-centric systems. Through comprehensive theoretical analysis and experimentation, we uncover that the segmented streaming approach is sub-optimal for machine-centric streaming systems compared to the straightforward frame-by-frame streaming approach. Furthermore, instead of relying on conventional frame-level metrics, we introduce a novel metric called the Age of Semantic Information (AoSI) to evaluate the performance of analytics-oriented streaming systems. This metric balances the quantity and timeliness of the semantic information. Consequently, we propose a compression ratio adaption method tailored to optimize AoSI performance for frame-by-frame streaming systems. This method leverages a deep learning (DL)-based predictor to discover the dynamic, latent relationships between compression and inference accuracy. Evaluated on actual streaming prototypes and real-world datasets, our method significantly surpasses both segmented and frame-by-frame baseline methods in terms of worst-case and average AoSI performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it