MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412792106 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.25.666863

Collective Behavior in Medaka Fish Depends on Discrete Kinematic States of Swimming Behavior

2025· preprint· en· W4412792106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCollective behaviorFish <Actinopterygii>KinematicsAnimal behaviorGroup behaviorBiological systemBiologyFisheryPhysicsZoologyClassical mechanicsPsychologySocial psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Complex collective behaviors such as schooling are believed to emerge from simple, individual-level computations that translate incoming information from conspecifics into actions. Recently, it has been proposed that discrete behavioral modes, or internal states, may modulate these computations, affecting the resulting collective behaviors. Direct evidence for such hierarchical control remains limited due to challenges in inferring hidden perception-action computations and uncovering discrete behavioral modes from continuous behaviors. To address this, we analyzed swimming behaviors of Medaka fish ( Oryzias latipes ) throughout development. At the group level, Medaka exhibit synchronized swimming formations that develop early, emerging around two weeks of age and stabilizing within one month. Unlike many teleost species that use burst-and-coast swim patterns, Medaka exhibit continuous tail and body undulations. We show that this continuous behavior can be segmented into three distinct kinematic states: acceleration, deceleration, and prolonged constant speed swimming. Using state-dependent computational models, we tested how Medaka translate social information from neighbors into actions across these kinematic states. The models revealed distinct computations governing social information processing and decision making in each state. Moreover, social responsiveness varied significantly between states—it was strongest during constant-speed epochs, intermediate during accelerations, and lowest during decelerations. Compared to similarly-sized zebrafish that employ burst-and-coast kinematics, Medaka exhibited greater diversity in state-dependent social interaction computations, ultimately resulting in stronger coordinated swimming. These findings highlight discrete behavioral modes as key modulators of social interaction computations underlying collective behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it