MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412845153 · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110972

A Mean Weighted Squared Error-based Neural Classifier for Intelligent Pattern Recognition in Smart Grids

2025· article· en· W4412845153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Mean squared errorArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkComputer scienceClassifier (UML)Speech recognitionMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supervised learning is widely used in pattern recognition and classification due to its strong ability to enhance data accuracy. Loss functions have proven to be a critical factor in enhancing the predictive accuracy of intelligent classifiers with diverse architectures and characteristics. This paper introduces a new extension of the conventional Mean Squared Error loss function, called Mean Weighted Squared Error (MWSE), specifically designed for renewable energy classification purposes. In the proposed MWSE, unequal weights are assigned to each estimated data point, unlike the conventional version. In this paper, Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks (MLPs) are employed to implement the proposed MWSE loss function. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed MWSE-MLP classifier, a total of four benchmark datasets related to the renewable energy have been utilized. The empirical findings demonstrate that the proposed classifier consistently outperforms conventional shallow/deep intelligent classifier across all case studies. On average, the proposed MWSE-MLP classifier achieved an impressive classification rate of 96.21%, which is 1.98% higher than that of the classic MLPs. In addition, numerical results of an extensively reviewed case study indicate that the proposed classifier can also yield more accurate results than some other well-known shallow intelligent classifiers such as support vector machine, random forest, and decision tree by 2.72%, 3.34%, and 3.82% improvement, respectively. These improvements are not limited to shallow intelligent classifiers, but also repeated for deep learning classifiers, such as the long short-term memory, transformers and convolutional deep neural networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it