MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412846899 · doi:10.5376/cgg.2024.15.0021

Evolutionary Patterns of Chromosomal Inversion in Cotton

2024· article· en· W4412846899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCotton Genomics and Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch in Cotton Cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromosomal inversionInversion (geology)Evolutionary biologyBiologyComputational biologyGeneticsKaryotypePaleontologyChromosomeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chromosomal inversions play a significant role in the evolutionary dynamics of plant genomes, including cotton. This study draws on recent genomic research to explore the evolutionary patterns of chromosomal inversions in cotton. Chromosomal inversions are widespread among various plant taxa and are often associated with locally favored traits and assortative mating, indicating their role in adaptation and speciation. In cotton, comparative genomic analyses reveal a complex evolutionary history, including an ancient polyploidy and extensive chromosomal rearrangements that have shaped the current genome structure. High-density genetic linkage maps have identified specific chromosomal inversions and translocations, further elucidating structural genomic changes within cotton. This study synthesizes current knowledge on the origin, frequency, and evolutionary significance of chromosomal inversions in cotton, providing insights into their contribution to genome evolution and adaptation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it