MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412866368 · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/adf701

SIDDA: SInkhorn Dynamic Domain Adaptation for image classification with equivariant neural networks

2025· article· en· W4412866368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFermilabOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEquivariant mapDomain adaptationAdaptation (eye)Computer scienceDomain (mathematical analysis)Image (mathematics)Artificial neural networkArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsPure mathematicsPsychologyMathematical analysisNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Modern neural networks (NNs) often do not generalize well in the presence of a "covariate shift''; that is, in situations where the training and test data distributions differ, but the conditional distribution of classification labels given the data remains unchanged. In such cases, NN generalization can be reduced to a problem of learning domain-invariant features. Domain adaptation (DA) methods include a broad range of techniques aimed at achieving this; however, these methods have struggled with the need for hyperparameter tuning, which then incurs computational costs. In this work, we introduce SIDDA, an out-of-the-box DA training algorithm built upon the Sinkhorn divergence, that can achieve effective domain alignment with minimal hyperparameter tuning and computational overhead. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method on multiple simulated and real datasets of varying complexity, including simple shapes, handwritten digits, and real astronomical observations. These datasets exhibit covariate shifts due to noise, blurring, and differences between telescopes. SIDDA is compatible with a variety of NN architectures, and it works particularly well in improving classification accuracy and model calibration when paired with equivariant NNs (ENNs). We find that SIDDA enhances the generalization capabilities of NNs, achieving up to a 40% improvement in classification accuracy on unlabeled target data. We also study the efficacy of DA on ENNs with respect to the varying orders of the dihedral group, and find that the model performance improves with higher orders. Finally, we find that SIDDA enhances model calibration on both source and target data, with the most significant gains in the unlabeled target domain---achieving over an order of magnitude improvement in the ECE and Brier score. SIDDA's versatility across various NN models and datasets, combined with its automated approach to domain alignment, has the potential to significantly advance multi-dataset studies by enabling the development of highly generalizable models

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it