In-Person Versus Virtual Case-Based Learning for Advanced Course in Engineering Technology Education
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Case-based learning (CBL) is an active learning instructional technique used to extend a more engaging learning experience to students. The purpose of this pedagogical study is to analyze the individual opinions of students participating in CBL. Students enrolled in the undergraduate course Advanced Biotechnology in the academic years 2021 and 2022 were asked to compare their opinions on an in-person CBL versus a virtual CBL environment. While most of the students favoured an in-person CBL setting, it was still found that CBL, regardless of whether it was offered in an in-person or a virtual platform, proved to improve essential learning and cognitive skills. These are comprised of critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork, communication, real-life technical skills, course performance, self-confidence, concept understanding and application, deeper understanding, and an overall positive learning experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it