MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412935307 · doi:10.1016/j.srs.2025.100265

Terrain complexity index: a novel metric for estimating multiscale three-dimensional terrain structure of montane areas based on digital elevation model

2025· article· en· W4412935307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience of Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsCampbell Scientific (Canada)
FundersKey Research and Development Program of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDigital elevation modelTerrainMontane ecologyElevation (ballistics)Index (typography)Metric (unit)Remote sensingGeographyGeologyComputer sciencePhysical geographyCartographyMathematicsEcologyGeometryEngineeringWorld Wide WebBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terrain complexity for describing the heterogenicity of terrains plays a key role in many disciplines, including geographic information science, atmospheric boundary layer meteorology, and ecology. However, due to the intrinsic relationships between terrain structure and the size or scale of the terrains, quantifying the terrain complexity faces the challenges in adequately capturing the intricate three-dimensional and multiscale features. Here, we developed a novel terrain complexity index ( TCI ) based on digital elevation models (DEMs), integrating fractal dimension ( D f ), entropy of terrain elements ( H ), rugosity ( R ), volume filling ratio ( V ), and slope ( α ) as T C I = ( D f + sin α ) H − 1 / R + V . The results showed a substantial variability in D f , H , R , and V with elevations and terrain unit sizes, which was related to feature specific and scale dependent. The terrain features ( D f , H , R , and V ) increased with the terrain unit size and tended to approach a constant value as the terrain unit size grew larger. It was found that the minimum terrain unit size for these terrain features increased with decreasing DEM resolutions (from 0.5 m to 120 m, ten levels), being well expressed as a power function of the DEM resolution ( R 2 ≥ 0.97). The minimum terrain unit size was uniquely determined using the change point detection. For example, the minimum terrain unit sizes were 140 m × 140 m and 7.56 km × 7.56 km at 0.5 m and 120 m DEM resolutions, respectively. These terrain features, based on the 30 m resolution DEM, explained 7–21 % of the variance in annual soil water erosion (ASWE) and 9–24 % of vascular plant diversity. The TCI exhibited superior predictive capabilities, outperforming individual terrain features by 2–10 % for both ASWE and vascular plant diversity. Our TCI emerges as an effective metric for quantifying the intricate three-dimensional structures of mountainous terrains, providing new insights into its influence on mountainous ecosystem structure and function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it