MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412974116 · doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1543564

Optimizing safe rates of pop-up inorganic starter nitrogen and potassium fertilizers for maize

2025· article· en· W4412974116 on OpenAlexaff
William Makaza, Lotfi Khiari, Mounir El Achaby

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Agronomy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGrowth and nutrition in plants
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarterPotassiumNitrogenAgronomyChemistryEnvironmental scienceFood scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applying starter nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fertilizers in a pop-up placement directly in the maize seed furrow is a delicate practice due to the direct contact between fertilizers and seeds. This proximity increases the risk of seed damage caused by the salinity of N and K fertilizers and the ammoniacal toxicity of nitrogen fertilizers. This study aims to determine the safe application rates of four commonly used starter fertilizers: monoammonium phosphate (MAP: NH4H2PO4), diammonium phosphate (DAP: (NH4)2HPO4), potassium chloride (KCl), and potassium sulfate (K2SO4) across three soil textures: fine (G1), medium (G2), and coarse (G3). A greenhouse experiment was conducted using a three-factor factorial design (four fertilizer sources, five application rates, and three soil textures) arranged in a randomized complete block design. ANOVA revealed significant effects of fertilizer source, application rate, soil texture, and significant two-way interactions between these factors. Polynomial contrasts of maize germination rates in response to increasing fertilizer doses allowed us to establish the maximum safe rates: i) DAP: 3 kg N ha-¹ in G1, 0.8 kg N ha-¹ in G2 and G3; ii) MAP: 5–7 kg N ha-¹ regardless of soil texture; iii) KCl: 10 kg K ha-¹ in G1, 14 kg K ha-¹ in G2 and G3; K2SO4: >16 kg K ha-¹ regardless of soil texture. The experiment also identified visual signs of toxicity, mainly associated with nitrogen fertilizers. These included delayed and reduced emergence, leaf chlorosis, necrotic roots and seeds, stunted and grooved coleoptiles, and, at high doses, seedling mortality. Other quantitative performance indicators, such as shoot and root biomass, chlorophyll readings, and early vigor, were strongly correlated with germination rates and supported the same conclusions regarding safe fertilizer rates. These findings provide practical recommendations for agronomists and farmers to optimize starter fertilizer management in maize by selecting appropriate application rates and fertilizer sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in AgronomySame topicGrowth and nutrition in plantsFrench-language works237,207