MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412979330 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113682

Improving explainable AI in attributing hydrological responses to climate variabilities in snow-dominated watersheds

2025· article· en· W4412979330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Soft Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsSnowEnvironmental scienceClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyComputer scienceMeteorologyGeologyGeographyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Explaining the decision-making of machine learning (ML) models, known as interpretation, connects data-driven results to real-world hydrological processes, representing the next major challenge in ML applications for attribution, beyond accurate simulation. To improve ML interpretability in watershed-scale hydrological attribution, this study develops an eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework that incorporates a novel interpretation algorithm, Lagrange Multipliers-Support Vectors (L-SV), within a feature-based, multi-criteria constraint ML framework termed Climate Feature-Bootstrapped Support Vector Regression (CF-BootSVR). SVR simulations have been conducted in two snow-dominated watersheds, showing satisfactory simulation accuracy (average R² and NSE ≥ 0.88). The aggregated features enhance model interpretability with physically meaningful inputs and reduce computational costs by up to 30 times. The multi-criteria-layer design improves robustness and generalizability (declines in R² and NSE ≤ 0.11) while reducing uncertainties compared to single-run models. L-SV ranks feature importance similarly to model-agnostic algorithms, Permutation Feature Importance (Perm) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), particularly in identifying the most sensitive features. L-SV also provides additional directions for feature contribution and enhances computational efficiency, being over 2513 and 2023 times faster than SHAP in the watersheds of Greata and 240, respectively. Furthermore, from a physical-based perspective, the XAI-derived attributions align with general hydrological expertise. Consequently, we conclude that CF-BootSVR offers an efficient approach to enhance predictive capabilities and deepen our understanding of climate-runoff relationships. Beyond hydrology, this CF-BootSVR framework establishes a generalizable paradigm for addressing issues related to climate seasonality. Moreover, L-SV demonstrates significant potential for broader applications in interpreting SVR models across diverse research domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it