MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of machine learning techniques to detect Listeria monocytogenes in Queso fresco using shortwave-infrared imaging

2025· article· en· W4412981307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsListeria monocytogenesFrescoShortwaveListeriaFood scienceComputer scienceMicrobiologyChemistryBiologyBacteriaPhysicsOpticsArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Queso fresco (QF) is a type of soft, fresh cheese, often prone to post-processing Listeria monocytogenes (LM) contamination. In this study, we evaluated the potential of shortwave infrared (SWIR) imaging to detect LM in QF. About 10 g of QF was surface inoculated with three different strains of LM, such that the final population was approximately 1.0 log 10 CFU/g, 2.0 log 10 CFU/g, and 3.0 log 10 CFU/g. Following image acquisition, statistical features namely mean reflectance, standard deviation of reflectance, skewness, and kurtosis were used to develop classification models. A trend of decrease in mean reflectance with increase in LM population was observed. Three types of classification (binary, population-wise, and population-strain-wise) were performed by four supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms - Logistic regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support vector machine (SVM), and k-Nearest neighbor (kNN). RF outperformed binary and population-wise classifications with an accuracy of 100 %. In binary classification, followed by RF, SVM and kNN exhibited an accuracy of 94 % and 92 % respectively. In population-wise classification, SVM and kNN had classification accuracies in the range of 85–88 %. Among the ML models, LR resulted in poor accuracies across all three classifications. Strain-wise classification did not yield reliable accuracies, implying the overlap in genetic similarities. This study demonstrates that SWIR imaging along with chemometrics can be a prospective tool for real-time detection and (or) quantification of LM in fresh cheeses like QF. This approach will likely be a novel safety assessment tool in cheese industry with the potential to enhance product safety and consumer confidence in consumption of fresh cheeses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it