Editorial: Bridging Innovation and Heritage in Digital Preservation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to Issue 54(2) of Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture, where we present a compelling collection of research that exemplifies the journal's commitment to exploring digital preservation through multiple lensestechnological, social, economic, political, and user-centered perspectives.This issue brings together scholars from across the globe, representing institutions in Indonesia, India, Canada, Ukraine, South Africa, and the United States, demonstrating the truly international scope of our field and the universal importance of preserving our digital and cultural heritage.The seven articles in this issue collectively address some of the most pressing challenges and innovative solutions in digital preservation today.From the application of cloud computing technologies in libraries to the preservation of indigenous cultural heritage, from automated environmental monitoring systems to community-driven archival practices, these contributions reflect the field's evolution toward more sophisticated, inclusive, and sustainable approaches to preservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it