MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413053695 · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2025.105140

Learning-aided state estimation for robotic rollators with experimental validation

2025· article· en· W4413053695 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdullah Yeaser, James Tung, Jan P. Huissoon, Ehsan Hashemi

Bibliographic record

VenueRobotics and Autonomous Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceState (computer science)Machine learningEstimationHuman–computer interactionSystems engineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While demand for assistive technology has risen with aging populations and concomitant increase in mobility disabilities, conventional (passive) walker designs have demonstrated safety and usability limitations. Robotic rollators (or 4-wheeled walkers) have been proposed to address concerns, including slip, fall, and collision risks. To develop control systems for robotic rollators, accurate estimation of the states is required. While model-based estimation approaches have been widely investigated for mobile robots, robotic rollators present unique challenges due to model parameter changes and uncertainties. In contrast, data-driven estimation approaches require sufficient excitation modes during learning to address corner cases. The proposed learning-aided state estimation (L-ASE) method augments an unscented transformation observer with a long short term memory (LSTM) based learning algorithm to estimate rollator states by using on-board inertial measurement unit data and wheel speeds. The stability and boundedness of the error covariance is investigated. The developed learning-aided estimation method is also experimentally verified for the walker-assisted gait and demonstrates superior performance using a robotic rollator platform in rigorous testing conditions. • A hybrid (learning-aided) estimation framework is proposed in this paper which augments an optimal variance Kalman-based filter with deep learning components to address model uncertainties for speed estimation. • In this regard, the major contributions and highlights of this paper can be summarized as follows: (i) A data-driven LSTM based state estimator was developed based on the robot kinematics measured using a low-cost IMU and encoders; (ii) A learning-aided state estimation approach (L-ASE) was developed by augmenting an unscented Kalman based observer with the LSTM estimates; and (iii) Experimental evaluation of both approaches using a custom robotic rollator platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRobotics and Autonomous SystemsSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207