MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413108069 · doi:10.1038/s41378-025-00975-7

Micro-spring force sensors using conductive photosensitive resin fabricated via two-photon polymerization

2025· article· en· W4413108069 on OpenAlexaff
Ningning Hu, Yucheng Deng, Lujia Ding, Lijun Men, Wenjun Zhang, Ruixue Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrosystems & Nanoengineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiniaturizationFabricationMaterials scienceNanotechnologyMicroscale chemistryMicroelectromechanical systemsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid miniaturization of electronic devices has fueled unprecedented demand for flexible, high-performance sensors across fields ranging from medical devices to robotics. Despite advances in fabrication techniques, the development of micro- and nano-scale flexible force sensors with superior sensitivity, stability, and biocompatibility remains a formidable challenge. In this study, we developed a novel conductive photosensitive resin specifically designed for two-photon polymerization, systematically optimized its printing parameters, and improved its structural design, thereby enabling the fabrication of high-precision micro-spring force sensors (MSFS). The proposed photosensitive resin, doped with MXene nanomaterials, combines exceptional mechanical strength and conductivity, overcoming limitations of traditional materials. Using a support vector machine model in machine learning techniques, we optimized the polymerizability of the resin under varied laser parameters, achieving a predictive accuracy of 92.66%. This model significantly reduced trial-and-error in the TPP process, accelerating the discovery of ideal fabrication conditions. Finite element analysis was employed to design and simulate the performance of the MSFS, guiding structural optimization to achieve high sensitivity and mechanical stability. The fabricated MSFS demonstrated outstanding electromechanical performance, with a sensitivity coefficient of 5.65 and a fabrication accuracy within ±50 nm, setting a new standard for MSFS precision. This work not only pushes the boundaries of sensor miniaturization but also introduces a scalable, efficient pathway for the rapid design and fabrication of high-performance flexible sensors. The development of flexible, high-performance microscale force sensors remains a critical challenge for next-generation biomedical and wearable electronics. Here, we report a novel micro-spring force sensor fabricated via two-photon polymerization using a custom-designed conductive photosensitive resin doped with MXene nanosheets. The resin formulation was optimized to balance mechanical strength and electrical conductivity while ensuring high-resolution printability. To accelerate parameter optimization, a support vector machine model was trained to predict polymerization outcomes based on laser conditions and material compositions, achieving a prediction accuracy of 92.66%. Finite element analysis guided the design of the MSFS structure, enabling tunable electromechanical performance. The fabricated MSFS exhibited excellent sensitivity high fabrication precision and long-term stability. These results demonstrate the potential of integrating machine learning, functional nanomaterials, and TPP microfabrication to enable scalable, high-precision production of intelligent microsensors for biomedical and soft robotic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrosystems & NanoengineeringSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207