MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413131781 · doi:10.1145/3747861

Rig My Ride: Automatic Rigging of Physics-based Vehicles for Games 48

2025· article· en· W4413131781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygon meshPipeline (software)Physics enginePolygon (computer graphics)TruckComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceSurface (topology)SegmentationSimulationGeometryAerospace engineeringComputer visionEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringFrame (networking)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend the concept of traditional rigging, which links polygonal meshes to an underlying skeleton for 3D characters, to the creation of physics-based wheeled vehicle models directly from surface geometry. Unlike character rigging, physics-based rigging involves assigning joints and collision proxies to animate the surface geometry. We present an automated pipeline that transforms a polygon soup into a physics-based, multi-wheeled vehicle model. The pipeline begins by using text-driven 2D image segmentation to identify vehicle components, which are then mapped onto the 3D mesh. A rough estimate of collision geometries and joint parameters is then used to initialize a rigid body simulation of the vehicle. Then, a numerical optimization refines these parameters in order to produce more realistic vehicle behaviour. The final result is a functioning physics-based vehicle for real-time simulations, which is demonstrated across a variety of vehicles, including cars, tricycles, lunar rovers, and even a semi-truck with 10 wheels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it