MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413184610 · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2025.07.006

Building Diverse, Equitable, and Inclusive Organizational Culture to Support Worker Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Qualitative Study of Employer and Worker Perspectives in Ontario Construction Skilled Trades

2025· article· en· W4413184610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSafety and Health at Work · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkEtobicoke General HospitalToronto Rehabilitation Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthQualitative researchOrganizational cultureBusinessPublic relationsEnvironmental healthPsychologyMedicineSociologyPolitical sciencePsychiatrySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explored Ontario construction skilled trades employer and worker perspectives on workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and the promotion of worker mental health and wellbeing through building DEI organizational culture. A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted. Fifty-two ( N = 52) participants were recruited and interviewed. Interview data were analyzed using a six-step thematic approach. Three themes were developed: 1) Challenges in organizational culture : participants reported that sexism and biased beliefs on the professional competency of workers from under-represented groups were prevalent within their organizations. Participants highlighted business leadership’ s role in building DEI organizational culture and addressing issues that have affected their organizational reputations and worker retention. 2) Barriers to promoting DEI : a meritocratic hiring approach was identified and restricted the opportunities for under-represented groups. Participants identified a lack of accommodations available in their workplace environment, and some reported lacking awareness of DEI-related issues. 3) Strategies to promote DEI : participants suggested that increasing early career opportunities could help apprentices from under-represented groups build experience and make informed career decisions. These opportunities may also help employers understand an apprentice’s qualifications. Establishing various resources and peer support systems to support the mental health and wellbeing of under-represented workers was also suggested. Multiple challenges existed within the current skilled trades organizational culture, including sexism, biases, hiring barriers, and insufficient accommodations and awareness. Creating career opportunities and social support systems is needed to address these challenges and support worker mental health and wellbeing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it