MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413195088 · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117007

Connection-based framework for assessing natural complexity in nonlinear adaptive systems

2025· article· en· W4413195088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChaos Solitons & Fractals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFulbright PortugalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsConnection (principal bundle)Nonlinear systemNatural (archaeology)Computer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationGeologyPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a quantitative framework for assessing natural complexity in adaptive systems, based on connection measures weighted by sensitivity indices. The methodology integrates system modeling, sensitivity analysis, and complexity assessment, enabling continuous monitoring and decision support in dynamic environments. Natural complexity is defined as an optimal level at which the system behaves in accordance with its nature, sustaining coherence between structure and function. By employing sensitivity-weighted connections, the framework captures both internal organization and adaptive dynamics, overcoming limitations of traditional metrics such as Shannon entropy and fractal dimension, which often neglect interaction intensity and temporal variability. The framework is validated through two case studies: a computational model of an Intensive Care Unit and a real-world startup acceleration ecosystem. In the Intensive Care Unit, periods of overload were identified through peaks in complexity, associated with an increased number of highly sensitive parameter connections. In contrast, in the startup ecosystem, systemic idleness was reflected by lower complexity levels, driven by weakly influential interactions among actors. These findings highlight the responsiveness and interpretability of the proposed metric compared to conventional approaches, particularly in tracking adaptive states over time. This connection-based framework supports the management of adaptive information systems, offering a dynamic and scalable complexity assessment tool. Its applicability spans medical informatics, business management, and distributed systems optimization, providing real-time insights that improve resilience and efficiency. In addition, the approach aligns with industry 4.0 paradigms, facilitating preventive analyses and adaptive decision-making in advanced technological environments. By offering a unified methodology for complexity evaluation, this research advances understanding and control of complex adaptive systems. • Natural complexity quantifies adaptive system behavior via connection modeling. • Sensitivity-weighted connections enable dynamic system complexity assessment. • The metric ψ ( c , γ c ) identifies idleness, regularity, and overload states. • Validation performed in ICU and startup acceleration real-world case studies. • Framework improves decision-making, resource allocation, and resilience planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it