MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413208051 · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101124

Gender, entrepreneurship, and marketing: Barriers and drivers for rural women in Iran

2025· article· en· W4413208051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Futures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipWomen entrepreneursBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entrepreneurship involves the development of economic activities through the combination of risk, creativity, and innovation. This study uniquely integrates cross-cultural theoretical perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior and marketing challenges, particularly within the under-researched rural Iranian context. By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, it advances the literature by providing a nuanced understanding of the interplay between individual, socio-cultural, and structural factors influencing women entrepreneurs’ marketing practices. Marketing is widely recognized as a critical determinant of business performance. This study explores the barriers and enablers of marketing activities for rural women entrepreneurs, employing a mixed-methods approach. The qualitative stage involved 36 women entrepreneurs, while the quantitative stage included 307 respondents selected via snowball and stratified random sampling, respectively. The analysis of qualitative data identified marketing as a primary challenge for these entrepreneurs, which was further categorized into individual, socio-cultural, legal, technical, and economic factors through factor analysis. The causal model results demonstrated the significant impact of environmental factors, marketing strategy, and marketing mix on the implementation of marketing methods. Furthermore, key barriers, such as lack of technical skills, inadequate legal support, and restrictive socio-cultural norms, were found to hinder marketing success. The study recommends the development of empowerment programs to enhance personal skills, the implementation of marketing and sales workshops, and the creation of a supportive legal and socio-cultural environment to facilitate women’s entrepreneurial activities. Additionally, fostering access to financial resources and establishing better distribution channels are essential to improving the marketing effectiveness of rural women entrepreneurs. These findings underscore the need for a multi-faceted approach, incorporating education, financial support, and structural changes, to drive sustainable growth for women-led businesses in rural areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it