MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413235436 · doi:10.23952/jnva.9.2025.6.04

An efficient CGA_ADMM for the metric nearness problem

2025· article· en· W4413235436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMetric (unit)MathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematical economicsEconomicsOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metric nearness problem aims to find a metric matrix nearest to a given dissimilarity matrix with the triangle inequalities valid.In this paper, we consider the metric nearness problem with the distance measured by the vector p (p = 1, 2, ) norm.Due to the O(n 3 ) constraints and O(n 2 ) variables, the main difficulty of solving this kind of large scale problems is the high memory requirement.We design a constraint generation based alternating direction method of multipliers (CGA ADMM) and take full advantage of the special structure of the constraint matrix so that the memory requirement of the CGA ADMM is moderate.Numerical experiments of the real world graph data sets involving up to 10 8 variables and 10 12 constraints demonstrate that our algorithm has a better performance than the current state-of-the-art algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it