A Review of AIoT in Sustainable Agriculture: Advancing Soil Management with IoT Sensors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As global population growth intensifies food demand, sustainable agricultural practices are a necessity to ensure both productivity and sustainability. The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) creates transformative potential for precision agriculture, enabling real-time soil monitoring, optimized resource use, and data-driven decision making. This review examines IoT and AI integrated systems for soil health management, with a focus on systems using NPK, pH, moisture, and temperature sensors to enhance soil health and management. Key advancements, such as multi-modal sensing platforms and low-cost innovations, are highlighted alongside persistent challenges, including sensor accuracy, connectivity limitations, and scalability barriers. This paper highlights the pivotal role of IoT in promoting sustainable agriculture, aligning with key United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It also emphasizes the need to address challenges such as cost, infrastructure limitations, and farmer adoption through supportive policies and continued technological development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it