Method for Measuring Friction Performance for Tertiary Packaging Under Dynamic Loading Representative of Transport Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT A critical function of tertiary packaging is to ensure cargo stability and security during transportation, preventing load shifts that may cause accidents or damage. This paper addresses the complexities of securing loads, particularly focusing on the coefficient of friction between the load and the transport vehicle's surface, which plays a crucial role in load stability and packaging system design. Anti‐slip mats, widely used in securing cargo, rely on a well‐defined friction coefficient. However, this coefficient varies with transport conditions and is rarely characterized under dynamic loading scenarios. The primary objective of this study is to introduce an innovative experimental method to study the friction coefficient of anti‐slip mats under conditions that replicate real transportation dynamics. To establish a foundation, we first analysed typical accelerations encountered in road transportation. Using a custom GPS‐accelerometer sensor embedded, we captured in situ acceleration data. These measurements offer insights into the frequency spectrum and amplitude of transport‐induced accelerations, vital for replicating such conditions in laboratory settings. Subsequently, we present the design of a testing machine that simulates the variation of normal load under a cargo caused by the transport vehicle dynamics and vibration. This compact system uses two symmetrical motors that oscillate masses at desired positions to produce a varying normal force. By measuring both normal load and traction force required to move the machine, it enables the calculation of friction coefficient variations as the applied load changes dynamically. The results contribute to establishing a more accurate characterization of anti‐slip materials behaviour under realistic dynamic transport conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".