MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413389602 · doi:10.1134/s0965542525700605

K-Optimal Preconditioners Based on Approximation of Inverse Matrices

2025· article· en· W4413389602 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInverseApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of constructing preconditioners of a special type for solving systems of linear algebraic equations is considered. A new approach to constructing preconditioners based on minimizing the K-condition number for the matrix $${{A}^{{ - 1}}}P$$ , where $$A$$ is the initial matrix of the system and $$P$$ is the preconditioner, is proposed. It is proved that for circulant matrices such an approach is equivalent to constructing the optimal Chan circulant for the inverse matrix. Numerical experiments are carried out on a series of benchmark problems with Toeplitz matrices, which show that the proposed approach allows one to significantly reduce the number of iterations of the conjugate gradient method compared to the classical approach. The obtained results open up new possibilities for constructing effective preconditioners in other classes of matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it