KDOSS-net: Knowledge distillation-based outpainting and semantic segmentation network for crop and weed images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weed management plays a crucial role in increasing crop yields. Semantic segmentation, which classifies each pixel in an image captured by a camera into categories such as crops, weeds, and background, is a widely used method in this context. However, conventional semantic segmentation methods rely solely on pixel information within the camera’s field of view (FOV), hindering their ability to detect weeds outside the visible area. This limitation can lead to incomplete weed removal and inefficient herbicide application. Incorporating information beyond the FOV in crop and weed segmentation is therefore essential for effective herbicide usage. Nevertheless, existing research on crop and weed segmentation has largely overlooked this limitation. To address this issue, we propose the knowledge distillation–based outpainting and semantic segmentation network (KDOSS-Net) for crop and weed images, a novel framework that enhances segmentation accuracy by leveraging information beyond the FOV. KDOSS-Net consists of two parts: the object prediction–guided outpainting and semantic segmentation network (OPOSS-Net), which serves as the teacher model by restoring areas outside the FOV and performing semantic segmentation, and the semantic segmentation without outpainting network (SSWO-Net), which serves as the student model, directly performing segmentation without outpainting. Through knowledge distillation (KD), the student model learns from the teacher’s outputs, which results in a lightweight yet highly accurate segmentation network that is suitable for deployment on agricultural robots with limited computing power. Experiments on three public datasets—Rice seedling and weed, CWFID, and BoniRob—yielded mean intersection over union ( mIOU ) scores of 0.6315, 0.7101, and 0.7524, respectively. These results demonstrate that KDOSS-Net achieves higher accuracy than existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) segmentation models while significantly reducing computational overhead. Furthermore, the weed information extracted using our method is automatically linked as input to the open-source large language and vision assistant (LLaVA), enabling the development of a system that recommends optimal herbicide strategies tailored to the detected weed class.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".