Solutions of Nonlinear Differential and Integral Equations via Optimality Results Involving Proximal Mappings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research paper delves into the application of optimality results in orthogonal fuzzy metric spaces to demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of solutions of nonlinear differential equations with boundary conditions and nonlinear integral equations, emphasizing the importance of orthogonal fuzzy metric spaces in extending fixed-point theory. Through introducing this innovative concept, the study provides a theoretical framework for analyzing mappings in diverse scenarios. In this study, we introduce the concept of best proximity point (BPP) within the framework of orthogonal fuzzy metric spaces by employing orthogonal fuzzy proximal contractive mappings. Moreover, this research explores the implications of the established results, considering both self-mappings and non-self mappings that share the same parameter set. Additionally, some examples are provided to illustrate the practical relevance of the proven results and consequences in various mathematical contexts. The findings of this study can open up avenues for further exploration and application in solving real-world problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it