Lightweight Hand Acupoint Recognition Based on Middle Finger Cun Measurement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Acupoint therapy plays a crucial role in the prevention and treatment of various diseases. Accurate and efficient intelligent acupoint recognition methods are essential for enhancing the operational capabilities of embodied intelligent robots in acupoint massage and related applications. This paper proposes a lightweight hand acupoint recognition (LHAR) method based on middle finger cun measurement. First, to obtain a lightweight model for rapid positioning of the hand area, on the basis of the design of the partially convolutional gated regularisation unit and the efficient shared convolutional detection head, an improved YOLO11 algorithm based on a lightweight efficient shared convolutional detection head (YOLO11‐SH) was proposed. Second, according to the theory of traditional Chinese medicine, a method of positional relationship determination between acupoints based on middle finger cun measurement is established. The MediaPipe algorithm is subsequently used to obtain 21 keypoints of the hand and serves as a reference point for obtaining features of middle finger cun via positional relationship determination. Then, the offset‐based localisation approach is adopted to achieve accurate recognition of acupoints by using the obtained feature of middle finger cun. Comparative experiments with five representative lightweight models demonstrate that YOLO11‐SH achieves an mAP@0.5 of 97.3%, with 1.59 × 10 6 parameters, 3.9 × 10 9 FLOPs, a model weight of 3.4 MB and an inference speed of 325.8 FPS, outperforming the comparison methods in terms of both recognition accuracy and model efficiency. The experimental results of acupoint recognition indicate that the overall recognition accuracy of LHAR has reached 94.49%. The average normalised displacement error for different acupoints ranges from 0.036 to 0.105, all within the error threshold of ≤ 0.15. Finally, LHAR is integrated into the robotic platform, and a robotic massage experiment is conducted to verify the effectiveness of LHAR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".