Predictions of Residential Property Prices for Ningbo City of Zhejiang Province in China Using Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Up to the current fall patterns that started at the end of 2021, the Chinese real estate market has developed at such a rapid pace over the course of the previous few decades. Investors and the government have found it more difficult to accurately forecast future property values as a consequence of this challenge. It is because of the current status of the economy that this has come about. For the purpose of this study, we use Gaussian process regressions using a wide range of kernels and basis functions to investigate the monthly residential property prices in Ningbo City, which is located in Zhejiang Province, China. The time period covered by this study is from May 2011 to July 2024. Estimated models are used in our forecasting endeavors. These models are trained using a mix of cross-validation and Bayesian optimizations. The models that were developed were effective in accurately forecasting the prices that would be seen out of sample from December 2021 to July 2024. With a relative root mean square error of 0.1626 percent, these models may be considered accurate. It is possible that our results might be utilized on their own or in conjunction with further forecasts in order to construct hypotheses about variations in the values of residential real estate and to carry out additional policy research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".