MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413753506 · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/adfffd

Development and application of a high-dimensional neural network potential for boron carbide

2025· article· en· W4413753506 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBoron carbideArtificial neural networkCarbideBoronMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceChemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A high-dimensional neural network potential (HDNNP) is developed to accurately model the potential energy surface of boron carbide. The HDNNP is trained on an extensive dataset of structures generated using a Monte Carlo algorithm, covering a wide range of stoichiometries and structural configurations. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations provided energy and atomic force data, which were encoded using atom-centered symmetry functions to capture local atomic environments. The resulting HDNNP exhibits exceptional predictive performance, accurately estimating energies and forces across diverse structural configurations of boron carbide. The model effectively captures essential structural, energetic, and mechanical properties, including elastic behavior and the influence of stoichiometry on stability. The HDNNP development followed an iterative refinement strategy, in which the initial training set was systematically expanded to 2931 structures by incorporating finite-temperature AIMD snapshots at 300 K, 600 K, and 1000 K, as well as extrapolative configurations from MD simulations and defect-containing cells. This approach resulted in an HDNNP model that is numerically stable and physically consistent up to 500 K, with only minor drift observed at 600 K. The HDNNP achieves exceptional accuracy in predicting energies, forces, and mechanical properties across temperatures, reproducing Young’s modulus values of 416 GPa at 10 K and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>420</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>20</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> GPa at 300 K, in close agreement with DFT and experimental ranges. The predicted ultimate tensile strength of 43 GPa at a failure strain of 0.14 at 300 K is consistent with atomistic simulations (40.23 GPa, strain 0.12). Comparative MD simulations show that the HDNNP outperforms Tersoff and ReaxFF in both accuracy and computational efficiency, enabling timesteps up to an order of magnitude larger, achieving 43% faster performance than Tersoff and 79% faster than ReaxFF. These results highlight the HDNNP as a robust and efficient tool for simulating boron carbide across a range of temperatures and deformation conditions, offering quantum-level accuracy for large-scale atomistic modeling in extreme environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it