MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413803913 · doi:10.1093/tas/txaf115

Intranasal zinc and vitamin A treatments alter response to bovine respiratory syncytial virus and <i>Mannheimia haemolytica</i> co-infection

2025· article· en· W4413803913 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emma L Rients, Carlos Enrique Franco, Stephanie L Hansen, Jodi L. McGill

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsNasal administrationVirologyMicrobiologyZincVirusRespiratory systemVitaminRespiratory tractBiologyMedicineImmunologyChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During disease, there may be increased local demands for zinc (Zn) and vitamin A to support pathogen response. This study evaluates the effects of intranasal Zn and vitamin A treatments on steers experimentally infected with bovine respiratory disease (BRD) pathogens, bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) and Mannheimia haemolytica, hypothesizing that steers treated with Zn and vitamin A (VA) will have improved recovery to BRD challenge. Forty-eight Angus crossbred steers (333 ± 4.2 kg) were utilized in two groups with identical challenge timelines. The day prior to challenge (d −1), steers were shipped for 6 hours. On d 0, steers were administered an aerosol inoculation with ~104 TCID50/mL BRSV strain 375 followed by an intratracheal inoculation with M. haemolytica (1.42 × 108 CFU strain D153, serotype A1) on d 5. On d 4, steers received intranasal treatments: zinc (IN ZN; 50 mg Zn oxide nanoparticles), vitamin A (IN VA; 200,000 IU as retinyl palmitate), a combination of zinc (50 mg) and vitamin A (200,000 IU; IN VA + ZN) or no treatment (CON). Statistics were analyzed using the Mixed procedure of SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC) and contrast statements were utilized to determine the effects of Zn, VA and intranasal treatment. Disease challenge resulted in mostly mild, subclinical signs of disease. There was an interaction for plasma VA (TRT × Day P < 0.01) where VA treated steers (IN VA and IN VA + ZN) had sustained plasma VA concentrations on d 5, when ZN and CON had decreased plasma VA. After challenge (d 19), liver VA concentrations were increased in IN VA (IN VA P = 0.03) and IN ZN (IN ZN P = 0.05) treated steers. Zn treated steers (ZN and ZN + VA) tended to have increased gene expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (P = 0.06) on d 5 and cellular retinol binding protein 1 (P = 0.08) on d 7 in cells collected from nasopharyngeal swabs. Additionally, immune cell populations from bronchoalveolar lavage were altered with increased CD11b expression on neutrophils (IN VA P = 0.01) and CD11c on macrophages (IN ZN P = 0.08) on d 7. During a mild disease challenge, intranasal Zn and VA treatments impacted lung inflammatory environment and nutritional immunity, suggesting potential benefits in mild or deficient nutritional statuses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational Animal ScienceSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207