MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413838025 · doi:10.1115/1.4069585

Adaptive Kalman Filter by Reinforcement Learning for Monitoring Aircraft Engines' Performance Against Abrupt Events

2025· article· en· W4413838025 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterReinforcement learningReinforcementComputer scienceExtended Kalman filterAeronauticsArtificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Engine performance's inverse problem is a well-known subject in the context of engine monitoring, particularly important for the aeronautics industry. In this framework, we aim to construct health/performance indicators (such as modular efficiencies and air mass flow rates) by leveraging operational data (i.e., sensors' measurements during flights) through the availability of a forward model (e.g., a thermodynamic simulator). An extensive literature is available on this topic, among which, Bayesian filtering—notably, Kalman filtering—is a dominant approach. However, even state-of-the-art methods still underperform in a scenario often found in practice: during its life, engine components not only degrade gradually over time due to wear but also can experience rare, abrupt changes in health states caused by uninformed maintenance or unknown external events such as Foreign Object Damages. In this work, we focus on this challenging scenario. We observe that Kalman filters (KF), when equipped with well-tuned a priori models, are capable of estimating the evolution of performance indicators due to degradations, but fail (if using the same a priori models) whenever an abrupt event occurs. To address this, we propose an adaptive filtering method, where parameters of the associated models are dynamically adjusted based on current estimates and observations. In particular, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) agent, called single-filter reinforcement learning Kalman filter (RLKF), to control the noise covariance matrix of the transition function of a Kalman filter. Pushing one step further, we introduce a second agent, called double-filter RLKF, aided by launching alongside a nonadaptive filter predicting the moments of abrupt events. We conduct several experiments with simulated data of an in-house turbofan engine, and show the superiority of the adaptive filters with the proposed reinforcement learning agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it