MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413838025 · doi:10.1115/1.4069585

Adaptive Kalman Filter by Reinforcement Learning for Monitoring Aircraft Engines' Performance Against Abrupt Events

2025· article· en· W4413838025 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Quan Vu, Sébastien Razakarivony, Thepaut Solène, Alfred Bauny

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterReinforcement learningReinforcementComputer scienceExtended Kalman filterAeronauticsArtificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Engine performance's inverse problem is a well-known subject in the context of engine monitoring, particularly important for the aeronautics industry. In this framework, we aim to construct health/performance indicators (such as modular efficiencies and air mass flow rates) by leveraging operational data (i.e., sensors' measurements during flights) through the availability of a forward model (e.g., a thermodynamic simulator). An extensive literature is available on this topic, among which, Bayesian filtering—notably, Kalman filtering—is a dominant approach. However, even state-of-the-art methods still underperform in a scenario often found in practice: during its life, engine components not only degrade gradually over time due to wear but also can experience rare, abrupt changes in health states caused by uninformed maintenance or unknown external events such as Foreign Object Damages. In this work, we focus on this challenging scenario. We observe that Kalman filters (KF), when equipped with well-tuned a priori models, are capable of estimating the evolution of performance indicators due to degradations, but fail (if using the same a priori models) whenever an abrupt event occurs. To address this, we propose an adaptive filtering method, where parameters of the associated models are dynamically adjusted based on current estimates and observations. In particular, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) agent, called single-filter reinforcement learning Kalman filter (RLKF), to control the noise covariance matrix of the transition function of a Kalman filter. Pushing one step further, we introduce a second agent, called double-filter RLKF, aided by launching alongside a nonadaptive filter predicting the moments of abrupt events. We conduct several experiments with simulated data of an in-house turbofan engine, and show the superiority of the adaptive filters with the proposed reinforcement learning agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicSoftware Reliability and Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207