MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413842963 · doi:10.1016/j.finel.2025.104431

Accelerating nonlinear finite element analysis via residual-aware neural network constitutive models

2025· article· en· W4413842963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFinite Elements in Analysis and Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodConstitutive equationNonlinear systemArtificial neural networkResidualComputer scienceStructural engineeringApplied mathematicsMathematicsAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) relies heavily on iterative methods such as the Newton–Raphson algorithm, with computational cost primarily driven by the repeated solution of large linear systems (global stage) and the evaluation of nonlinear constitutive laws (local stage). This work proposes a neural network-based surrogate to accelerate the local stage by approximating explicit constitutive models. A compact feed-forward neural network is trained on synthetic data generated from standard material laws and embedded into the commercial solver Simcenter TM Samcef®, replacing the local integration of nonlinear equations. To ensure accuracy and robustness, a residual-based safeguard is introduced to restore the original physics-based model when neural network predictions are insufficient. To further explore the benefits of the proposed approach in reducing overall simulation cost, the method is also applied within a reduced-order modeling framework. While such techniques effectively reduce the cost of solving large linear systems, the evaluation of nonlinear terms often remains a dominant bottleneck. The surrogate is therefore also assessed using the nonlinear model reduction method available in Samcef , namely the LATIN-PGD approach, although a detailed study of this method is not the focus of this paper. Beyond simplified test cases, the method is implemented and validated in full-scale, industrially relevant simulations involving elasto-viscoplastic materials. Results from academic and industrial-scale applications, including a high-pressure turbine blade, demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly reduces computation time while preserving solution accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of combining data-driven surrogates with residual-controlled correction to enhance the efficiency and scalability of nonlinear FEA workflows under realistic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it