MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413887432 · doi:10.1109/les.2025.3604285

Low-Power Face Recognition Using Joint Optical and Electronic Deep Neural Networks

2025· article· en· W4413887432 on OpenAlexafffund
Xuening Dong, Bokun Zhao, Hassan Rahbardar Mojaver, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur, Brett H. Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Embedded Systems Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceJoint (building)Facial recognition systemArtificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Artificial neural networkPower (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power and energy constraints limit the implementation of deep face recognition algorithms on edge devices. To address this issue, we propose an electro-optic hybrid system, with an always-on optical neural network that continuously monitors faces in a given environment and activates deep face recognition when a face is detected. We adapt the system for a scenario similar to a smart door lock application, involving center-aligned, randomly appearing faces. Tested on the Labeled Faces in the Wild dataset, the proposed system achieves 95.8% accuracy with 16 features extracted from face images by principal components analysis and enables a remarkable 33.2% reduction in power usage compared to the same neural network on digital processors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Embedded Systems LettersSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207