Climate change and transformation in forest fire regimes: an opportunity for the implementation of assisted migration of tree species in the Canadian boreal forest?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change is intensifying fire regimes in boreal forests, leading to ecological disruption and raising concerns about forest resilience and post-disturbance recovery. Altered fire dynamics creates novel opportunities for implementing adaptive silviculture for climate change, including assisted migration, the intentional movement and establishment of tree species or tree populations outside their current range of distribution to better match anticipated future climates. Here, we examine how the increasing frequency, severity, and spatial extent of Canadian boreal wildfires can serve as strategic windows for introducing climate-resilient tree species and genotypes. We review how fire influences the availability and suitability of post-fire sites for assisted migration, highlighting how fire-induced changes in soil abiotic and biotic properties may facilitate or hinder the establishment of relocated tree species. While fire can simplify site preparation, reduce biotic competition, and temporarily enhance soil nutrient availability, it may also degrade soil structure by consuming or altering soil organic matter and increasing soil susceptibility to erosion and disrupt essential mycorrhizal associations. We argue that assisted migration of tree species can be a proactive silvicultural tool when used in areas with regeneration failure or where future climate conditions are likely to exceed the tolerance limits of native species. Whilst scientific evidence remains limited on the regeneration success of migrated species and genotypes in post-fire environments, we argue for an integrated adaptation strategy that combines natural regeneration with targeted assisted migration interventions, guided by local site conditions, genetic considerations, and policy support, to build resilient boreal forests under changing disturbance regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".