MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413924198 · doi:10.1080/87559129.2025.2553684

Potential of Functional Factors in Foods for 3D Printing to Manage Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

2025· article· en· W4413924198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Reviews International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMicroencapsulation and Drying Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsRisk analysis (engineering)BiotechnologyBiochemical engineeringFood scienceComputer scienceBiologyBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary therapy has emerged as an adjunctive therapeutic strategy for the management of metabolic syndrome. However, traditional means of food processing are not able to meet the specific taste, nutritional, and emotional value needs of people with metabolic syndrome. The emergence of 3D food printing technology has led to breakthroughs in the creation of customized and personalized food products. This paper provides a systematic review of functional ingredients in foods suitable for controlling metabolic syndrome and their potential applications in 3D printing. In addition, it evaluates the impact of pretreatment and post-treatment technologies on the printability of these functional materials as well as the quality of printed products. Finally, the potential application of artificial intelligence and big data in helping to manage metabolic syndrome is explored, as well as its role in guiding and supporting 3D food printing. This review aims to provide theoretical support for future research on functional foods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it