MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413948252 · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.018

Scheduling in Industry 4.0: A Digital Twin-based approach for scheduling and smart Material-Handling Considerations

2025· article· en· W4413948252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueManufacturing Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceSmart manufacturingIndustry 4.0Industrial engineeringDistributed computingManufacturing engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart manufacturing constitutes the backbone of Industry 4.0 (I4.0), allowing for heightened autonomy of the various interacting cyber-physical systems on the production floor. Connectivity, a vital enabler, plays a crucial role through state-of-the-art Digital Twin (DT) technologies driven by underlying innovations like the industrial Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, and advancements in sensory devices. In this article, it is argued that a pre-DT optimal approach employing queuing aspects of the machine buffers can play a crucial role in optimally determining the baseline schedules for the shop as well as a few related system-design aspects vis-à-vis the size of the utilized fleet of smart Automated Guided Vehicles (sAGVs) and the employed buffer capacities. sAGVs are autonomous vehicles used for material transportation between machines, reducing manual handling and improving efficiency. Initial dispatching rules for the sAGVs are also determined at that stage. Such initially produced schedules and sAGV dispatching rules are constantly revisited, though, later in the development lifecycle of the manufacturing system at the DT level, according to the undertaking disruptions on the shop floor. At that DT stage, other operational aspects pertaining to the material handling system, namely, aisle directionality, mobile modular buffers, and input/output points of the work centers, are adjusted. The employed two-stage planning framework, integrating both Pre-DT and full-scale DT planning, aims to optimize aspects of the system from the design phase to its real-time operations, employing a novel methodology leveraging mathematical programming, queuing models, and deep learning. A key finding of this study is that dynamically adjusting aisle directionality, rerouting AGVs through alternative paths, and deploying modular mobile buffers while optimizing job scheduling significantly reduce transportation time, minimize delays, and enhance real-time adaptability. The proposed framework effectively mitigates disruptions, achieving 100% elimination of machine failure impact, a 33% reduction in aisle congestion delays, and a 37% decrease in buffer overflow delays, demonstrating notable improvements in system performance and resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it