MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413983102 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2024.0904

A Logic-Based Benders Decomposition for the Car Resequencing Problem with a Painted Body Storage

2025· article· en· W4413983102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAssembly Line Balancing Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenders' decompositionComputer scienceDecompositionParallel computingMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cost of producing diverse cars depends on the sequence in which they are arranged in the body shop, paint shop, and assembly shop. Before entering the downstream assembly shop, the upstream car sequence shared by the body shop and paint shop is readjusted via the painted body storage, which consists of several first-in-first-out lanes. The car resequencing problem addressed in this paper requires determining the upstream and downstream sequences and the car-to-lane assignment to minimize the total cost of the three shops. We propose a nested logic–based Benders decomposition approach with three levels, where each car is assigned a body and a color in the first level to determine the upstream sequence. In the second level, cars are rearranged by determining their configurations and downstream positions. A feasible assignment of cars to lanes is sought in the third level to respect this sequence change. We provide a mathematical formulation for each level and propose two shortest-path problem reformulations for the first level, where solving the first reformulation is equivalent to a k-shortest-path problem. The second reformulation is a shortest-path model restricted by demand constraints. A lower bound, valid inequalities, and a heuristic method are also proposed as enhancements. Computational results show that our approach can handle instances of up to 120 cars, about 10 times more than previous studies. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to provide some managerial insights. History: Accepted by Andrea Lodi, Area Editor for Design & Analysis of Algorithms–Discrete. Funding: Financial support for this work was provided by the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [Grant 2021-04037] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72372087]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0904 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2024.0904 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it