Enhancing agent sociability by extending interaction protocols using machine learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interaction protocols are commonly used in agent-based systems. They ensure good coordination between agents by proposing a specific message exchange pattern. However, these interaction protocols are not perfect; they need more extensions to offer, among others, better performance and scalability, mainly when tight deadlines are involved. In this case, participants often fail to answer some requests before their deadlines due to overload, bottlenecks, slow network, or being busy or blocked. Designing agents without considering this issue may decrease their sociability, which wastes valuable chances to obtain the best goals. The proposed approach uses the participant's experience to train supervised learning models to predict if the replies will reach initiators before deadlines or not, thereby enabling a prioritization mechanism for handling interaction requests more effectively. The proposed approach has been evaluated using multiple Contract Net interaction scenarios of two case studies under the JADE platform. The promising results show a significant increase in agents’ sociability measured by a new metric that we have proposed called Sociability Degree via Interaction Protocols (SD IP ) where it was maintained even when systems scale up in term of number of agents and initiated interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it