Privacy-First security models for AI-integrated identity governance in multi-access cloud and edge environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), multi-access edge computing (MEC), and cloud environments has transformed identity governance by enabling real-time decision-making and seamless access control across decentralized infrastructures. However, this evolution has also introduced complex challenges concerning data privacy, identity trust, and security. This review explores privacy-first security models that integrate AI for identity governance in hybrid cloud-edge architectures. It evaluates privacy-preserving techniques such as homomorphic encryption, federated learning, and zero-knowledge proofs, emphasizing their role in ensuring secure identity authentication, authorization, and auditability. The paper critically analyzes the limitations of conventional identity and access management (IAM) frameworks in dynamic, resource-constrained edge environments and proposes adaptive models that embed privacy by design. Furthermore, the review investigates the interplay between explainable AI (XAI) and policy enforcement for transparent and compliant identity governance. By synthesizing advancements in cryptographic methods, AI reasoning engines, and decentralized identity (DID) systems, the paper outlines a roadmap for building secure, scalable, and privacy-compliant identity infrastructures in the era of pervasive computing. Keywords: Privacy-Preserving Identity Governance, AI-Driven Access Control, Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC). Federated Identity Management, Explainable AI (XAI), Zero-Knowledge Proofs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.057 | 0.122 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it