MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414076506 · doi:10.1111/jcal.70099

Multimodal Cluster Analysis of Medical Residents' Emotions During High‐Fidelity Harassment Bystander Simulation

2025· article· en· W4414076506 on OpenAlexafffund
Byunghoon “Tony” Ahn, Negar Heidari Matin, Myriam Johnson, So Yeon Lee, Ning‐Zi Sun, Jason M. Harley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Learning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Traits and Psychology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsHarassmentFidelityContent analysisCluster analysisCluster (spacecraft)Bystander effectValue (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background High fidelity simulations can be an effective tool for anti‐harassment education. While emotions have been identified as crucial in simulation‐based education, their role in anti‐harassment education within medical training remains underexplored. Objectives We aimed to investigate emotional profiles of medical residents during harassment bystander simulation training via hierarchical clustering based on multimodal emotions data. Methods Twenty seven internal medicine residents with complete data sets that were part of a larger study were recruited. Emotions were captured through self‐report surveys, an electronic bracelet that records electrodermal activity, and speech content analysis based on the residents' simulation debriefing. The study involved residents performing a simulated central line insertion while a simulated harassment took place that they could use to practice intervening in harassment. Results Our cluster analysis revealed three equal‐sized groups: ‘Emotionally Balanced, Minimal Arousal’, ‘Positive, Spiked Arousal’ and ‘Negative High Arousal’. The clusters had distinct levels of self‐report emotions and electrodermal activity. Content analysis revealed distinct emotions, and sources of emotions between the clusters. Post hoc analysis revealed that the ‘Emotionally Balanced, Minimal Arousal’ group showed a higher propensity for directly confronting the harasser, indicating a composed emotional state conducive to focusing on simulation objectives. Conclusions Our findings reveal the varied emotional profiles that can be expected in simulation‐based medical education and underscore the value of a multimodal approach to understanding these dynamics. Furthermore, the study highlights the criticality of recognising the sources of emotions and promoting effective emotion regulation strategies, especially in authentic learning environments where emotional responses are complex and impactful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computer Assisted LearningSame topicPersonality Traits and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207