MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neuropsychiatric manifestations of Kufs disease

2025· article· en· W4414078422 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Souganya Vijayan, Arun Selvaraj

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseAngerThrowingCognitionPsychiatric DiseaseFamily history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kufs disease is a type of adult-onset neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (ACNL), caused by the deposition of lipopigments in the neuronal tissues.[1] The incidence of Kufs disease is 1 in 1,000,000 worldwide.[2] It presents with progressive neurological impairment, intellectual deterioration, seizures, abnormal limb movements, and eventually, early death.[2–4] Few patients present with psychiatric complaints during the initial phase which can range from subtle behavioral changes like anergy, to florid psychosis.[1] The cognitive decline can present with aggression, irrelevant speech, assaultive and disorganized behavior. A 37-year-old male, was brought in with complaints of behavioral disturbances, frequent unprovoked anger outbreaks, and assaultive behavior for 3 years. He had irrelevant talk and aimless wandering, and sometimes got lost on the way back home. He exhibited inappropriate behaviors like voiding at random places, undressing in public, and handling garbage for the past 6 months. He was unable to carry out his routine chores, was clumsy in day-to-day activities, and had difficulty following instructions. He was unable to remember his address and could not recognize his close friends and relatives, which progressed to loss of memory about self-identity. In later days, he deteriorated significantly, when he exhibited regressive symptoms like childlike talk, inappropriate smiling, throwing tantrums, and bedwetting. He expressed difficulty in comprehension and communication, and lacked emotional attachment to his family members. He gradually became highly dependent and required assistance for personal care. There was no history of seizure, loss of consciousness, involuntary movement of limbs, headache, visual defects, or any signs of infection. There was no history of substance abuse, head injury, or concurrent medications. A provisional diagnosis of early-onset frontotemporal dementia (FTD) was made, and the patient was admitted and evaluated in detail. Neurological examination revealed normal motor and sensory functions. Babinski test showed plantar flexion with withdrawal response. No abnormal involuntary limb movements were observed, and gait was normal. Dysarthria was present. Mental status examination showed impaired attention, concentration, memory, speech, and language functions. His comprehension was intact, but calculation, judgement, and abstraction were impaired. There were no psychotic symptoms. He scored 15 out of 30 in montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) and 24 out of 30 in mini-mental state examination (MMSE), suggesting severe cognitive decline. The patient was not cooperative for the neuropsychological assessment. Exhaustive blood and urine investigations were conducted to identify any signs of infection, hormonal imbalance, or deficiencies, which revealed microcytic hypochromic anemia, elevated triglycerides, and elevated vitamin B12 levels. There was also reduced ceruloplasmin. The cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) analysis and fundus examination were normal. Electroencephalogram (EEG) finding was a diffuse slowing of waves without any epileptiform discharges, suggestive of an encephalitic pattern, and the MRI brain showed global cerebral atrophy, with predominant involvement of frontal and temporal areas and cerebellar atrophy. Exome sequencing was done to identify autoimmune causes. The report came positive for a homogenous, likely pathogenic variant in the cathepsin F (CTSF) gene. A genetic diagnosis of autosomal recessive neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, type 13, Kufs type, was confirmed in the report. Hence, a diagnosis of ACNL–type B with severe cognitive decline was made. Symptomatic management was given with cognitive enhancers, benzodiazepines, and supplements. Low-dose antipsychotics were given for behavioral problems. The patient deteriorated over the years, and he attained an early demise. The duration between the onset of symptoms and his demise was about 5 years. ANCL is a rare and highly fatal lysosomal storage disorder, characterized by the accumulation of excess auto fluorescent lipofuscin-like storage material in the lysosomes of neuronal tissues, which affects the structural integrity and functioning of the cell. This eventually causes the loss of neurons and the proliferation of glial cells.[3–5] This progressive neuronal loss causes atrophic changes in the cortical grey matter, cerebellum, and subsequent ventricular enlargement.[3,6] Differentiating Kufs from FTD can be challenging due to similar clinical features like behavioral and personality changes, and executive dysfunction. The early age of onset, significant and rapidly progressing cognitive decline, and neuroimaging are the key identifiers of Kufs disease.[7] Neuroimaging also helps in differentiating various other neurodegenerative disorders.[8] Demonstration of lysosomal lipofuscin deposits is confirmatory.[2] With the advent of genetic studies, the demonstration of a specific gene mutation is the gold standard.[9] The most common gene identified in autosomal recessive Kufs is CLN6 and CTSF variant (CLN6 > CTSF).[10,11] Autosomal dominant Kufs can be caused by DNAJC5.[12] Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207