A novel Vector-Symbolic Architecture for graph encoding and its application to viral pangenome-based species classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Viral species classification is crucial for understanding viral evolution, epidemiology, and developing effective diagnostics and treatments. Traditional methods often rely on sequence similarity, which can be challenging for rapidly evolving viruses. Pangenomes, offering a comprehensive representation of species' genomic diversity, provide a richer perspective, but their analysis often requires advanced computational methods. We investigate the use of Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC), also known as Vector-Symbolic Architecture (VSA), an emerging computing paradigm that relies on vectors in high-dimensional spaces to encode a multi-species viral pangenome.We develop a new method for encoding graph-structured viral pangenomes using high-dimensional vectors. Pangenomes are represented as weighted de Bruijn graphs constructed using sequences of consecutive k-mers from the genomes, while information about the genome species (their taxonomic label) is encoded as specific high-dimensional vectors (species hypervectors) that act as weights on the edges of the graph. The weighted de Bruijn graph representation is encoded into a single high-dimensional vector. We tested three classification strategies: a flat model at the species level, a flat model at the genus level, and a two-step hierarchical model.We applied our method to a pangenome comprising 542 viral species from NCBI GenBank. Our results reveal a complex relationship between model architecture and classification accuracy. The flat species-level model achieved the highest accuracy, correctly classifying 87.08% of test genomes. Counter-intuitively, simplifying the problem to the genus level or using a hard-routing hierarchical approach degraded performance, with accuracies dropping to 60.51% and 33.57% respectively. Rather than revealing an inherent flaw in hierarchical modeling, these outcomes highlight critical architectural limitations of our current routing strategy, reflecting the interaction between routing errors and downstream error propagation in multi-step models. The model's reconstruction rate proved to be a measure of model-internal coherence, rather than a direct predictor of correctness.This novel approach offers a promising new direction for viral classification, not only for its predictive power but its ability to reveal underlying challenges in genomic taxonomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".